An Overview of the Various Appropriate Types of Cell Lines for the Production of Monoclonal Antibodies
1★★ Corresponding author
- 1Faculty of Medicine, Halic University, Istanbul, TURKIYE.
CORRESPONDENCE
Shahin Javanmard
Faculty of Medicine, Halic University, Istanbul, TURKIYE.
Received: 14-02-2023; Revised: 28-03-2023; Accepted: 02-05-2023.
Volume 13, Issue 3 · pp. 381-392 · 2023 · DOI: 10.5530/ijpi.13.3.049
ABSTRACT
As the first monoclonal antibodies [mAbs] were produced in 1975, the challenge to improve antibody engineering started. Since then, therapeutic antibodies have become the predominant class of new drugs developed recently, and an essential part of progress has affected cell lines. From the first pioneer hybridoma cells to the current vanguard Chinese Hamster Ovary [CHO] cells dramatic improvement has been seen. An essential part of this process is choosing the suitable cell line to seed the targeted antibody gene. This review encompasses all the current evidence to compare various proper cell lines for monoclonal antibody production such as mammalian cells, plant cells, bacterial cells, and yeast cells. Valid long-term data, regarding glycosylation, efficiency, and safety, support the current popularity of CHO cells. At the same time, other types of cell lines also show some promise for emerging needs for more therapeutic antibodies on the market.
KEYWORDS
REFERENCES
As publishedShowing references and in-text citations exactly as published.
Cite this article
SELECT FORMAT
Javanmard, S. (2023). An Overview of the Various Appropriate Types of Cell Lines for the Production of Monoclonal Antibodies. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation, 13(3), 381-392. https://doi.org/10.5530/ijpi.13.3.049
Copyright and licence
© 2023 Author(s)
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. CC BY-NC-SA 4.0